An update on Larry Dixon Jr.'s
two-seat dragster
On April
11 drag racer Larry Dixon Junior filed an antitrust lawsuit against the
Glendora, California, based national Hot Rod Association (NHRA) with the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of Indiana in Indianapolis. Dixon’s
suit accused the sanctioning body of wrongfully suspending him and blacklisting
him two years ago, which has deprived him of his livelihood. The plaintiffs in the suit are Championship
Adventures, LLC, Larry Dixon, and Larry Dixon Racing, LLC.
According to the
suit, Dixon, with 62 career NHRA victories and his investment partner Nick
Salamone, a Philadelphia-area businessman, spent two years and “hundreds of
thousands of dollars” to develop a unique two-seater car that caters to the
popular fan-experience trend.
Larry Dixon in happier times
at the 2017 SEMA show
The two-seat dragster unveiled
at the 2017 SEMA show
Dixon said
the NHRA supported the idea he pitched it to NHRA officials in 2016, but the
trouble began when the vehicle went on display at the Traxxas booth at the 2017
SEMA (Specialty Equipment Market Association) trade show in Las Vegas Nevada. Dixon
distributed a press release unveiling Larry Dixon Top Fuel Experience, billing
it as the “fastest ride in drag racing.”
Larry Dixon Jr.'s two-seat dragster
as shown at the 2018 PRI show
Dixon’s complaint claims
that on the opening day of the trade show, an NHRA official “strategically
visited Championship Adventures’ booth at a time when Mr. Dixon was not there
and conducted an unauthorized ‘inspection’ of the prototype of the two-seater
car.”
The NHRA official spotted an expired NHRA safety inspection sticker in
the car, which Dixon said was there “simply because the chassis for the
prototype for the two-seater dragster was originally a car that had competed in
the NHRA.” Dixon argues was that “no one had removed the sticker, as there was
no need to remove an expired sticker when the car was not built as a
competition car.”
Days after the SEMA
show the NHRA issued a “statement of action against participant” notice which
claimed Dixon had violated NHRA rules and suspended him indefinitely as a
driver, team owner or crew member. Dixon’s suit
alleges that the NHRA’s action was “an obvious effort to use NHRA’s unfettered
control over professional drag racing to control the market in which two-seater
exhibition cars compete for business.”
The
complaint said Dixon “has now been entirely deprived of his livelihood and sole
source of income by this unjustifiable suspension — which is, in effect, a
lifetime ban from NHRA — unless he relinquishes an investment of hundreds of
thousands of dollars, as well as the future profits that he could derive from
that investment.”
All photos by the author
No comments:
Post a Comment